Skip to content

Conversation

@victorgarciaesgi
Copy link
Collaborator

WIP but localy the tests are already working. It was faster than I expected.

There are still issues with coverage in the CI I think. I don't have much experience with that aspect

Copy link
Owner

@dwightjack dwightjack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

I have added a couple of comments and a possible fix for code coverage.

Thanks! 🙇

@victorgarciaesgi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yeah I will had happy-dom! I wanted to be on par with what you have done before :)

@victorgarciaesgi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added your recommendations and fixed coverage config!

@victorgarciaesgi victorgarciaesgi changed the title Replaced vitest config with jest ⚡️ Replaced jest with vitest ⚡️ Mar 3, 2022
@dwightjack dwightjack self-requested a review March 3, 2022 10:00
Copy link
Owner

@dwightjack dwightjack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect! I can see the results on codeclimate.

Let's merge this! Thanks again!

@dwightjack dwightjack merged commit 99809c4 into next Mar 3, 2022
@dwightjack dwightjack mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2022
@dwightjack dwightjack deleted the feat/vitest branch July 23, 2022 02:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants