FIX: Recursive batch flush can save beans in wrong order#3148
Merged
rbygrave merged 1 commit intoebean-orm:masterfrom Aug 14, 2023
Merged
FIX: Recursive batch flush can save beans in wrong order#3148rbygrave merged 1 commit intoebean-orm:masterfrom
rbygrave merged 1 commit intoebean-orm:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
if you try to save a persist graph, you normally expect, that the elements are in a logical order.
Here:
OR
This works fine, if no batch flush occur.
Now, it can happen, that during save of customer 1, something (a DB.find in a postInsert hook, a lazy load) triggers a batch flush, which causes to process all internal save queues NOW.
As ebean is currently processing the "customer" query, and the next step of saving customer 2 is interrupted by the flush,
ebean tries to save contact a,b,c + d,e,f - the later three will fail, because customer 2 is not yet saved and has no ID.
As suggested solution, we disable
transaction.setFlushOnQueryin the executeNow.Roland
Co-authored-by: Noemi Praml noemi.praml@foconis.de
Co-authored-by: Roland Praml roland.praml@foconis.de