feat: adopt conformsTo from dct#5780
Merged
Merged
Conversation
jimmarino
approved these changes
May 26, 2026
paullatzelsperger
approved these changes
May 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR changes/adds
Adopt conformsTo from dct.
A new known property has been added into the Asset#properties
conformsTowhich is namespaced on dublin core (dct).The property can be set on the asset and it will be shown in the Catalog
Dataset. TheconformToterm definitionhas been added in edc management api context and in the additional edc jsonld context in dsp protocol.
Since it's not a term adopted yet by the upstream dsp protocol it's custom to edc profile of the dsp protocol.
Potential breaking change might arise if people were storing a
conformToproperty in the assets which previous of this PR where expanded into default edc namespacehttps://w3id.org/edc/v0.0.1/ns/which could affect how the property is presented in the catalog and management api.Why it does that
Briefly state why the change was necessary.
Further notes
List other areas of code that have changed but are not necessarily linked to the main feature. This could be method
signature changes, package declarations, bugs that were encountered and were fixed inline, etc.
Who will sponsor this feature?
Please @-mention the committer that will sponsor your feature.
Linked Issue(s)
Closes #5774
Please be sure to take a look at the contributing guidelines and our etiquette for pull requests.