Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@fexpal can you have a look and merge this PR? The only changes are in the package.json (adding devDependency), prettierrc and prettierignore. We can also change the prettier configuration to use other indentations etc. |
guneet-baweja
pushed a commit
to guneet-baweja/editdor
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 10, 2026
Apply formatting rules
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have noticed with @TejInaco that the prettierrc was actually never applied and there were already some discrepencies in the codebase such as:
Running prettier was not possible as well as the default parser was babel. I have adjusted the prettier configuration to reduce the diff as well