Skip to content

Conversation

@merks
Copy link
Contributor

@merks merks commented May 22, 2025

@merks
Copy link
Contributor Author

merks commented May 22, 2025

Probably this is the best place because this is where the class was deleted.

Copy link
Contributor

@jonahgraham jonahgraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well I have asked genuitec to engage in the open on this. If they do they should be able to tell us an upper bound. If they don't we should take our best guess.

I think best guess is blocking currently published version. While genuitec aren't engaging very openly, they are at least saying they are working on this.

So +1 to how Ed has it
+0 to 2025)
And -1 to 9999)

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Test Results

 1 824 files  ±0   1 824 suites  ±0   1h 38m 18s ⏱️ + 5m 47s
 7 925 tests ±0   7 697 ✅ ±0  228 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
23 862 runs  ±0  23 114 ✅ ±0  748 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d887b42. ± Comparison against base commit a9ec6c9.

@akurtakov akurtakov merged commit 84a3413 into eclipse-platform:master May 22, 2025
18 checks passed
@merks merks deleted the pr-devstyle branch May 23, 2025 06:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants