Skip to content

I20240115-1800

@HeikoKlare HeikoKlare tagged this 15 Jan 19:43
In order to reduce/avoid usage of ambiguous `assertEquals` (hard to
distinguish expected/actual) and prepare for a migration to JUnit 5 with
swapped expected/actual parameters in the `assertEquals` signature, this
change replaces certain `assertEquals` calls with AssertJ assertions:
* Replace `assertEquals(MESSAGE, EXPECTED, ACTUAL.length)` with
`assertThat(ACTUAL).as(MESSAGE).hasSize(EXPECTED))` and remove
obsolete message where possible
* Replace `assertEquals(EXPECTED, ACTUAL.length)` with
`assertThat(ACTUAL).hasSize(EXPECTED))`
* Replace `hasSize(0)` with `isEmpty()` to improve failure messages
* Combine array size comparison with array contents comparison where
possible
Assets 2
Loading