-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Update: bazel and module dependency update #64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Similar to the module_template update to bazel 8.3.0 and update the buildifier to "the closest" matching one.
Update versions of the dependencies by either - check the latest released in the score bazel registry - check usage in other modules docs-as-code is updated in a own PR. Locally verified and did according clean up changes: - remove of not needed defaults - point to correct upstread ci-cd script - newline added from automatic "fix" runs
|
docs-as-code is handled in #61 ... now it is --> #64 (comment) |
License Check Results🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command: bazel run //:license-checkStatus: Click to expand output |
this is now part of the PR |
- workflows/docs.yml: adapt to new bazel target
- add top level //:doc target (with used needs)
- update to docs-as-code (with local overwrite to latest main for needs
visibility fix), add dependencies for needs
- update conf.py based on docs-as-code/docs/conf.py
- update all references in docs:
- platform prefix changed from SCORE_ to S-CORE_
- persistency requirements prefix changed from __kvs__ to __persistency__
- Some requirements got renamed (feat_req__kvs__stable_api not found
anymore)
80bf490 to
7d014dc
Compare
|
https://github.com/eclipse-score/inc_mw_per/actions/runs/16826826518/job/47665143508?pr=64 still uses the workflow file from main with the outdated target ... verified locally via |
AlexanderLanin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a lot of changes at once, but LGTM
joshualicht
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
ae349b99cafc1e79d98c0391a851fc5664c04ebc ->
46923f5c4f302bd9feae0261588687aaf32e3c5c