Skip to content

Conversation

@phongt
Copy link
Contributor

@phongt phongt commented Aug 25, 2025

Because of https://github.com/eclipse-score/inc_mw_per/blob/main/BUILD#L24 using docs() from "@score_docs_as_code//:docs.bzl" and score_docs_as_code deps on "score_python_basics"

@phongt phongt changed the title [#84] Add score_python_basics bazel MODULE Add score_python_basics bazel MODULE Aug 25, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 25, 2025

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output
[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.3.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 55cab6f6-48f8-4e89-a2f5-dd0de4214f9c
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
DEBUG: Rule 'rules_boost+' indicated that a canonical reproducible form can be obtained by modifying arguments integrity = "sha256-aSViuHoOdF32Ue/Cx02/mOzyEebHMFuifjZs4GNWjsE="
DEBUG: Repository rules_boost+ instantiated at:
  <builtin>: in <toplevel>
Repository rule http_archive defined at:
  /home/runner/.bazel/external/bazel_tools/tools/build_defs/repo/http.bzl:394:31: in <toplevel>
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 1 packages loaded
Loading: 1 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (2 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (2 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (74 packages loaded, 9 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (95 packages loaded, 93 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (137 packages loaded, 2428 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (137 packages loaded, 2549 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (137 packages loaded, 2549 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (140 packages loaded, 4556 targets configured)

DEBUG: Rule 'toolchains_llvm++llvm+llvm_toolchain_llvm' indicated that a canonical reproducible form can be obtained by modifying arguments _action_listener = <unknown object com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute$LabelListLateBoundDefault>, _config_dependencies = [], _configure = False, _environ = [], _original_name = "llvm_toolchain_llvm"
DEBUG: Repository toolchains_llvm++llvm+llvm_toolchain_llvm instantiated at:
  <builtin>: in <toplevel>
Repository rule llvm defined at:
  /home/runner/.bazel/external/toolchains_llvm+/toolchain/rules.bzl:27:23: in <toplevel>
Analyzing: target //:license-check (140 packages loaded, 4556 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (141 packages loaded, 6491 targets configured).
[7 / 14] Creating runfiles tree bazel-out/k8-opt-exec-ST-d57f47055a04/bin/external/score_dash_license_checker+/tool/formatters/dash_format_converter.runfiles [for tool]; 0s local
[10 / 14] JavaToolchainCompileClasses external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath_classes; 0s disk-cache
INFO: From Generating Dash formatted dependency file ...:
INFO: Successfully converted 65 packages from Cargo.lock to bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/formatted.txt
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 196.131s, Critical Path: 0.26s
INFO: 14 processes: 5 disk cache hit, 9 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 14 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
[main] INFO Querying Eclipse Foundation for license data for 65 items.
[main] INFO Found 34 items.
[main] INFO Querying ClearlyDefined for license data for 31 items.
[main] INFO Found 31 items.
[main] INFO License information could not be automatically verified for the following content:
[main] INFO 
[main] INFO crate/cratesio/-/test_scenarios_rust/0.2.0
[main] INFO 
[main] INFO This content is either not correctly mapped by the system, or requires review.
[main] INFO A review is required for crate/cratesio/-/test_scenarios_rust/0.2.0.
[main] INFO A review request already exists https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/22885 .

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

@phongt
Copy link
Contributor Author

phongt commented Aug 25, 2025

@vinodreddy-g Please review the PR. Thank you.

Copy link
Member

@nicu1989 nicu1989 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Please fix gitlint and formatting.

This fixed "bazel build //..." eclipse-score#84
inc_mw_per using score_docs_as_code had score_python_basics as
bazel deps
@phongt phongt force-pushed the add_score_python_basics branch from 6648388 to 115d64d Compare August 25, 2025 10:25
@phongt phongt requested a review from nicu1989 August 25, 2025 10:34
@vinodreddy-g vinodreddy-g merged commit de5d94a into eclipse-score:main Aug 25, 2025
11 checks passed
atarekra pushed a commit to Valeo-S-CORE-Organization/persistency that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2025
…e#93)

This fixed "bazel build //..." eclipse-score#84
inc_mw_per using score_docs_as_code had score_python_basics as
bazel deps
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants