Replace ipc_bridge with scrample code #29
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This way, EBcLfSA and QNX use the same test code repository for the communication example. The documentation is updated, and all commands are double-checked.
opajonk
force-pushed
the
add_scrample_to_ebclfsa
branch
from
c53f44e to
5f64cb8
Compare
antonkri
previously approved these changes
Nov 12, 2025
These do not need special treatment (e.g. patches) so we should be able to use them in the regular way.
antonkri
approved these changes
Nov 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This way, EBcLfSA and QNX use the same test code repository for the communication example.
The documentation is updated, and all commands are double-checked.
Also, the used toolchain is tagged and the two binary assets related to it are attached to the related GitHub release.