Skip to content

Conversation

@sophokles73
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@AnotherDaniel AnotherDaniel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good; one question: there are some version bumps that code be made - for bytes, rand, thiserror, tokio - should we take this opportunity?

@sophokles73
Copy link
Contributor Author

Didn't we have a discussion about the overall strategy for the MSRV we want to follow?
IIRC we decided to generally keep close to the latest & greatest and to not pay too much attention on backwards compatibility (yet). Transposing this to the dependencies, what you say makes sense to me :-)
I think we can safely use more recent minor versions whenever we already use a major version > 0, assuming that the components actually follow semver practices ...

Updated a few dependencies to more recent versions.
@sophokles73 sophokles73 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 12, 2025
@sophokles73 sophokles73 merged commit 6c6c850 into eclipse-uprotocol:main Mar 12, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants