Merged
Conversation
cmwhited
approved these changes
May 9, 2023
Contributor
cmwhited
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Like the move to get away from using the IPFS supported version of the subgraph.
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds subgraph versions labels to deployments, which will eventually be used to support more graceful subgraph upgrades. We could have used the SubgraphVersion label directly from the subgraph, but that would create a dependency on the version of the network subgraph that uses IPFS. We are avoiding that and parsing from IPFS manually so that the non-IPFS version of the network subgraph can be put on the network for gateways to use.