Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
Hi Daniel @dschipfel Thanks for this one - it is built! Internal and external. Saving an incident with something in the comment box adds an entry to its timeline, and you now choose who it is for. Internal is the default, and it resets to internal every time the dialog opens - publishing should be the deliberate act, and the choice is not carried over from the last incident you touched. Each entry in the timeline is badged so you can tell afterwards which is which. The portal. Under the service list, each incident appears with the services it affects and a "Show updates" link that opens a timestamped table - what was said and when, oldest first, so it reads as the story of the outage. Collapsed by default, and the updates are only fetched when somebody opens one. It is off until you turn it on, under System - Service status on the portal. That is deliberate rather than cautious: switching it on publishes incident titles, and titles are written for your own team rather than for customers. Worth reading yours before end users do. Everything written before this feature existed is internal and stays internal. How far back the portal goes is configurable: only what is happening now, that plus anything resolved in the last so-many days, or the full history. The middle one is the default - a resolved entry is the most reassuring thing on a status page for somebody who was hit by the outage an hour ago. Two things you did not ask for, which came out of testing it properly. I realised that fixing a typo used to post the sentence a second time, so a reader saw it twice with the wrong version first - and that merely opening an incident and pressing Save republished the last message. Neither mattered much while the timeline was internal. Both are fixed: saving only adds an entry when the status, the wording or the affected services actually changed, and each entry now has a correct and a remove action so a typo is fixed where it is. You can also change whether an entry is internal or external after the fact, so a note that should have gone out can be published without retyping it. Things to try:
There is a new section in the in-app help under Service Status, a plain-English one in the portal's own help for your end users, and a wiki page: |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Current situation
The Service Status module is a great way to communicate outages, maintenance windows, and service disruptions. However, all comments are currently treated the same way, which can make it difficult to distinguish between internal documentation and customer-facing updates.
Suggested improvement
Introduce two types of comments within incidents and service status updates:
Internal Comment
External Comment
Self-Service Portal Enhancements
External comments should be displayed in the Self-Service Portal together with a timestamp.
Example:
Expandable Update History
To keep the Self-Service Portal clean and easy to use, the status update history could be displayed in a collapsible section.
Suggested behavior:
Benefits
Many organizations provide regular status updates during incidents. Having dedicated external comments with timestamps and an expandable history would make the Service Status module much more useful as a customer communication tool while still allowing internal teams to document technical details separately.
All reactions