Skip to content

Conversation

@efremidze
Copy link
Owner

@efremidze efremidze commented Aug 14, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added macOS support (macOS 14+) alongside existing iOS support (iOS 14+).
  • Chores

    • Updated to a newer Swift tools version for improved compatibility.
    • Streamlined package configuration to follow default conventions.
    • Standardized bundle identifiers across targets.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The PR updates Package.swift to Swift tools 5.9, adds macOS v14 to supported platforms, and simplifies the target declaration. It also changes bundle identifiers in the Xcode project for both the library and example targets. No source code or public API changes are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Swift Package configuration
Package.swift
Bumped tools version 5.3→5.9; platforms updated to [.iOS(.v14), .macOS(.v14)]; simplified target to .target(name: "VisualEffectView") removing explicit dependencies/path.
Xcode project settings
VisualEffectView.xcodeproj/.../project.pbxproj
Updated PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIERs: library to com.example.VisualEffectView, example app to com.example for Debug/Release; no other build settings modified.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A rabbit taps the Package file—hop!
Tools to five-nine, we do a quick swap.
macOS joins the waltzing queue,
Targets trimmed, identifiers new.
With whiskers twitching, configs align—
Carrots compiled, builds look fine. 🥕✨

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update-package

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@efremidze efremidze merged commit 3bbee2e into master Aug 14, 2025
3 checks passed
@efremidze efremidze deleted the update-package branch August 14, 2025 09:17
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Package.swift (1)

9-11: Fix trailing comma in platforms to satisfy linter

SwiftLint warns about a trailing comma in the platforms array. Remove the trailing comma after the last element.

Apply this diff:

-        .iOS(.v14),
-        .macOS(.v14),
+        .iOS(.v14),
+        .macOS(.v14)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these settings in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b82591 and c3faa2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Package.swift (2 hunks)
  • VisualEffectView.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: build
Package.swift

[warning] 10-10:
Trailing Comma Violation: Collection literals should not have trailing commas (trailing_comma)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
VisualEffectView.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (1)

209-216: Xcode project compatibility lags behind Swift tools 5.9

compatibilityVersion = "Xcode 12.0" and LastUpgradeCheck = 1200 suggest an older project format. With Package.swift moving to tools 5.9 (Xcode 15+), consider bumping project settings or documenting that SPM requires Xcode 15 while the Xcode project remains older.

Would you like me to propose a minimal pbxproj upgrade diff (e.g., LastUpgradeCheck) and a README note about the minimum Xcode versions?

Package.swift (1)

1-1: Swift tools 5.9 requires Xcode 15+

Bumping the tools version effectively raises the minimum Xcode for SPM consumers. Confirm this is intentional and update README/Release notes accordingly.

Would you like me to add a short “Requirements” note to the README indicating Xcode 15 / Swift 5.9 minimum for SPM users?

Comment on lines +9 to 11
.iOS(.v14),
.macOS(.v14),
],
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Adding macOS support: verify cross-platform compilation

With .macOS(.v14) added, ensure sources compile on macOS. If files import UIKit, gate code with #if canImport(UIKit) or provide AppKit counterparts (e.g., NSVisualEffectView).

Run this script to find UIKit imports and check for conditional guards:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "Scanning for UIKit imports (may be iOS-only):"
rg -n --glob '!**/DerivedData/**' $'^\\s*import\\s+UIKit\\b' -A 2 -B 2 || true

echo
echo "Scanning for AppKit imports or NSVisualEffectView usage:"
rg -n --glob '!**/DerivedData/**' $'\\b(AppKit|NSVisualEffectView)\\b' -A 2 -B 2 || true

echo
echo "Scanning for platform conditionals:"
rg -n --glob '!**/DerivedData/**' $'^\\s*#if\\s+canImport\\((UIKit|AppKit)\\)' -A 2 -B 0 || true

echo
echo "If UIKit files are not conditionally compiled or AppKit equivalents are missing, macOS builds via SPM may fail."

Length of output: 1890


Action required — macOS target added but UIKit-only sources found

Package.swift (lines 9–11):

        .iOS(.v14),
        .macOS(.v14),
    ],

Short summary:
Scan shows direct import UIKit in library/example sources and no AppKit imports or #if canImport(...) guards — macOS builds via SPM will likely fail.

Files to address:

  • Sources/VisualEffectView.swift:9 — import UIKit
  • Sources/UIViewEffectView+Helpers.swift:8 — import UIKit
  • Example/ViewController.swift:9 — import UIKit
  • Example/Extensions.swift:9 — import UIKit
  • Example/AppDelegate.swift:9 — import UIKit

Suggested fixes (pick one or combine):

  • Wrap iOS-only code/imports with conditional compilation:
    • #if canImport(UIKit)
      import UIKit
      // iOS-only code
      #endif
  • Add AppKit equivalents/adapters (e.g., map UIVisualEffectView → NSVisualEffectView or provide small platform adapter/typealiases).
  • Or move iOS-only files into an iOS-only target (or exclude them from the macOS target) in Package.swift.

Please address these so the package actually compiles on macOS.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: build

[warning] 10-10:
Trailing Comma Violation: Collection literals should not have trailing commas (trailing_comma)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Package.swift around lines 9–11 and the listed source files, you added a
macOS target but several files import UIKit directly which will break macOS
builds; fix by either (A) wrapping UIKit-only imports and the iOS-only code
blocks in those files with conditional compilation (#if canImport(UIKit) ...
#endif) so macOS builds skip them, or (B) provide macOS equivalents/adapters
(typealiases and small mapping for UIVisualEffectView → NSVisualEffectView and
any UIKit APIs used) and guard where platform-specific implementations differ,
or (C) remove/exclude those files from the macOS target (or remove macOS
platform) in Package.swift; pick one approach and apply it consistently to
Sources/VisualEffectView.swift, Sources/UIViewEffectView+Helpers.swift,
Example/ViewController.swift, Example/Extensions.swift, and
Example/AppDelegate.swift so macOS SPM builds no longer import UIKit unguarded.

Comment on lines +25 to 26
.target(name: "VisualEffectView")
]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Target path removal likely breaks SPM source discovery

The target declaration dropped path: "Sources". Unless the repository layout is Sources/VisualEffectView/..., SPM will not find sources by default. If your files live directly under Sources (as the Xcode project suggests), keep the explicit path.

Apply this diff to restore the explicit path:

-        .target(name: "VisualEffectView")
+        .target(
+            name: "VisualEffectView",
+            path: "Sources"
+        )

Run this script to verify the layout matches SPM expectations:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "Checking for default SPM layout (Sources/VisualEffectView)..."
if [ -d "Sources/VisualEffectView" ]; then
  echo "OK: Found Sources/VisualEffectView (path override not required)."
else
  echo "WARN: Sources/VisualEffectView not found."
  echo "Listing Swift files directly under Sources (if any):"
  fd -e swift --max-depth 1 Sources || true
  echo
  echo "If Swift files are directly under Sources/, keep path: \"Sources\" in Package.swift."
fi

Length of output: 617


Restore explicit SPM path for VisualEffectView target (Package.swift)

Verification output: WARN: Sources/VisualEffectView not found. Without an explicit path SPM will not discover the target's sources — either add the path or move sources into Sources/VisualEffectView.

  • File: Package.swift — lines 25-26: update the target declaration

Apply this diff:

-        .target(name: "VisualEffectView")
+        .target(
+            name: "VisualEffectView",
+            path: "Sources"
+        )
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
.target(name: "VisualEffectView")
]
.target(
name: "VisualEffectView",
path: "Sources"
)
]
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Package.swift around lines 25-26, the VisualEffectView target is declared
without an explicit path so SPM warns "Sources/VisualEffectView not found";
update the target declaration to include the explicit path to the sources (e.g.
.target(name: "VisualEffectView", path: "Sources/VisualEffectView")) or
alternatively move the source files into Sources/VisualEffectView so SPM can
discover them.

);
MARKETING_VERSION = 4.1.5;
PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.efremidze.VisualEffectView;
PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.example.VisualEffectView;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid placeholder bundle identifiers for the framework target

Using com.example.* is a placeholder and can cause code signing/provisioning conflicts for consumers and CI. Prefer a unique reverse-DNS identifier (e.g., previous com.efremidze.*) or at least a non-placeholder domain.

Apply this diff to use a unique bundle identifier:

-				PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.example.VisualEffectView;
+				PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.efremidze.VisualEffectView;

Apply at both the Debug and Release configurations (Lines 442 and 467).

Also applies to: 467-467

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In VisualEffectView.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj around lines 442 and 467, the
framework target uses the placeholder PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER =
com.example.VisualEffectView; — replace that placeholder with a unique
reverse‑DNS identifier (for example com.efremidze.VisualEffectView) in both the
Debug (line 442) and Release (line 467) build configurations; search the file
for any other occurrences of com.example.VisualEffectView and update them
consistently, then save the project file so code signing/provisioning will use
the non‑placeholder bundle identifier.

Comment on lines +484 to 485
PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.example;
PRODUCT_NAME = "$(TARGET_NAME)";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use a unique bundle identifier for the Example app

Setting the Example app to com.example can conflict with other sample apps and makes device installs brittle. Include a unique suffix (or revert to the original).

Apply this diff to disambiguate the Example app’s bundle ID:

-				PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.example;
+				PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.example.Example;

Apply for both Debug (Line 484) and Release (Line 500).

Also applies to: 500-501

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In VisualEffectView.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj around lines 484-485 and 500-501,
the PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER is set to the generic "com.example"; replace both
occurrences with a unique bundle identifier (for example
com.yourcompany.VisualEffectView or com.example.VisualEffectViewExample) for
Debug and Release, update any corresponding Info.plist entries if present to
match the new identifier, and verify the project builds and installs to a
device.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Aug 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant