Skip to content

Switch Jet Benchmarks to edm4eic::Jet#107

Merged
wdconinc merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
switch-to-jet-type
May 28, 2026
Merged

Switch Jet Benchmarks to edm4eic::Jet#107
wdconinc merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
switch-to-jet-type

Conversation

@ruse-traveler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Please link to any relevant presentations or discussions.

This PR updates the JES/R benchmark to work with the switch from edm4eic::ReconstructedParticle to edm4eic::Jet implemented in EICrecon#2674.

What is the urgency of this PR?

  • High (please describe reason below)
  • Medium
  • Low

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bug fix (issue #__)
  • New feature (issue #__)
  • Optimization (issue #__)
  • Updated documentation
  • other: __

Please check if any of the following apply

  • This PR introduces breaking changes. Please describe changes users need to make below.
  • This PR changes default behavior. Please describe changes below.
  • AI was used in preparing this PR. Please describe usage below.

If the EDM4eic version is 8.9.0 or greater, then this benchmark will also output histograms of the reconstructed/generated jet areas.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wdconinc wdconinc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to make sense to me. Did you test this by chance with a local file that has edm4eic::Jet entries?

@wdconinc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Seems to make sense to me. Did you test this by chance with a local file that has edm4eic::Jet entries?

Actually, forget that. It must work since we are already running with EDM4eic 8.9.0 here.

@wdconinc wdconinc merged commit ebe5359 into master May 28, 2026
2 checks passed
@wdconinc wdconinc deleted the switch-to-jet-type branch May 28, 2026 20:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants