Skip to content

Conversation

@carsonip
Copy link
Member

@carsonip carsonip commented Nov 26, 2025

Summary

Update TBS benchmark numbers. 9.0 vs 8.18 -> 9.2 vs 8.19. The numbers may show a decrease but that is likely due to a metric reporting bugfix: elastic/apm-server#18891

Part of elastic/apm-server#17503

Generative AI disclosure

  1. Did you use a generative AI (GenAI) tool to assist in creating this contribution?
  • Yes
  • No
  1. If you answered "Yes" to the previous question, please specify the tool(s) and model(s) used (e.g., Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT-4, etc.).

Tool(s) and model(s) used:
Copilot Claude Sonnet 4.5

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Vale Linting Results

Summary: 40 suggestions found

💡 Suggestions (40)
File Line Rule Message
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 164 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 165 Elastic.Acronyms 'IOPS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 167 Elastic.Capitalization 'APM Server 9.2' should use sentence-style capitalization.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 171 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 171 Elastic.WordChoice Consider using 'deactivated, deselected, hidden, turned off, unavailable' instead of 'disabled', unless the term is in the UI.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 172 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 172 Elastic.Acronyms 'EBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 172 Elastic.Acronyms 'IOPS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 173 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 174 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 174 Elastic.WordChoice Consider using 'deactivated, deselected, hidden, turned off, unavailable' instead of 'disabled', unless the term is in the UI.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 175 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 175 Elastic.Acronyms 'EBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 175 Elastic.Acronyms 'IOPS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 176 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 177 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 177 Elastic.WordChoice Consider using 'deactivated, deselected, hidden, turned off, unavailable' instead of 'disabled', unless the term is in the UI.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 178 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 178 Elastic.Acronyms 'EBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 178 Elastic.Acronyms 'IOPS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 179 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 181 Elastic.Capitalization 'APM Server 8.19' should use sentence-style capitalization.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 185 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 185 Elastic.WordChoice Consider using 'deactivated, deselected, hidden, turned off, unavailable' instead of 'disabled', unless the term is in the UI.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 186 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 186 Elastic.Acronyms 'EBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 186 Elastic.Acronyms 'IOPS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 187 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 188 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 188 Elastic.WordChoice Consider using 'deactivated, deselected, hidden, turned off, unavailable' instead of 'disabled', unless the term is in the UI.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 189 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 189 Elastic.Acronyms 'EBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 189 Elastic.Acronyms 'IOPS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 190 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 191 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 191 Elastic.WordChoice Consider using 'deactivated, deselected, hidden, turned off, unavailable' instead of 'disabled', unless the term is in the UI.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 192 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 192 Elastic.Acronyms 'EBS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 192 Elastic.Acronyms 'IOPS' has no definition.
solutions/observability/apm/transaction-sampling.md 193 Elastic.Acronyms 'TBS' has no definition.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 26, 2025

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

Copy link
Contributor

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @carsonip!
Are we intentionally removing 9.0 data to keep only the latest?
These docs are supposed to remain valid for any user from 9.0 to 9.x, unless this is something you've already discussed previously?

cc @elastic/ingest-docs maybe?

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne requested review from a team December 1, 2025 10:29
@simitt
Copy link
Contributor

simitt commented Dec 1, 2025

Part of the changes don't actually come from the version upgrade but from different underlying hardware templates. IMO it makes sense to align the numbers with the templates that are now the default. I don't see it realistic to build and publish data for several versions and templates.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants