Add docs for AutoOps on ECK#4792
Conversation
Vale Linting ResultsSummary: 23 suggestions found 💡 Suggestions (23)
The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide. To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale. |
arnonst
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM!
@naemono - Can you review the page deploy-manage/monitor/autoops/autoops-sm-troubleshoot-eck-no-clusters.md
kilfoyle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! 🦖
This is very nicely organized! I added just a few super minor suggestions.
shainaraskas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
some comments around the recurring self-managed problem and ECK availability
this thread about the self-managed terminology represents our strategy: https://elastic.slack.com/archives/C07APH4RCDT/p1769519793259699
naemono
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Couple more minor things I've seen.
|
7.17 went EOL on Jan 15 so we should remove 7.17 from here
|
shainaraskas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sorry about the full nightmare that this caused in the FAQ. this is an interesting use case, and the best reason I've seen in the past year to have some concept of a "not Elastic-managed" term. I will try to think about this more to make this problem less painful.
Changes look good/consistent. Couple of somewhat unrelated comments to consider but all good from the deployments terminology / versioning perspective now :)
|
@shainaraskas Some 7.1.7 customers are eligible to use AutoOps until 2027, but I agree that this is confusing. It's on my list to figure out with the PMs |

Summary
This PR:
Closes https://github.com/elastic/docs-content-internal/issues/499.
Generative AI disclosure