Skip to content

Format JNA errors and supplement tmp file error#6537

Merged
stefnestor merged 7 commits into
elastic:mainfrom
stefnestor:stef_jnaTempDir
May 20, 2026
Merged

Format JNA errors and supplement tmp file error#6537
stefnestor merged 7 commits into
elastic:mainfrom
stefnestor:stef_jnaTempDir

Conversation

@stefnestor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

👋 Adds error strings for JNA temporary directory from here & formats existing into a bullet list for easier scanning because all the info's there but users seem to miss it still.

Generative AI disclosure

  1. Did you use a generative AI (GenAI) tool to assist in creating this contribution?
  • Yes
  • No

@stefnestor stefnestor requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2026 22:36
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 16, 2026

Elastic Docs AI PR menu

Check the box to run an AI review for this pull request.

Powered by GitHub Agentic Workflows and docs-actions. For more information, reach out to the docs team.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 16, 2026

🔍 Preview links for changed docs

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 16, 2026

✅ Vale Linting Results

No issues found on modified lines!


The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide.

To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale.

@stefnestor stefnestor enabled auto-merge (squash) May 16, 2026 22:44
Comment thread deploy-manage/deploy/self-managed/executable-jna-tmpdir.md Outdated
theletterf added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2026
)

## Summary

The same-repo guard introduced in #6484 (SEC-043) unconditionally
blocked fork PRs from triggering the docs review, even when the actor
was an Elastic org member. This caused confusion (see #6537) where a
repo member checking the box on a fork PR was silently ignored.

**Change:** the guard now calls `checkMembershipForUser` before
short-circuiting. Org members can trigger reviews on fork PRs;
non-members are still blocked.

```
fork PR + non-member → blocked (unchanged)
fork PR + org member → allowed (new)
same-repo PR         → unchanged
```

The companion change in the canonical template is in
elastic/oblt-aw#896.

## Test plan

- [ ] Fork PR: org member checks the box → `evaluate-trigger` passes,
docs review runs
- [ ] Fork PR: fork contributor checks the box → `evaluate-trigger`
short-circuits, no review
- [ ] Same-repo PR: unchanged behavior

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@theletterf
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@stefnestor You should now be able to trigger the PR AI review on your forked PRs, since you're a member of elastic :) (Let me know if that's not the case)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Docs review summary

Focus areas

  • Style and clarity: Three small grammar/wording issues in the new bullet list (see inline comments). Overall the restructuring is clear and scannable — good improvement.
  • Jargon: JNA and libffi are explained in the preceding paragraph; acronyms are acceptable in context.
  • Frontmatter and applies_to: Frontmatter is complete and valid. mapped_pages preserved correctly.
  • Content type fit: Troubleshooting/reference hybrid — appropriate for this page.
  • Parent issue satisfaction: No linked issue; PR goal (add new error string, reformat existing errors into a list) is satisfied.

Notes

  • Vale found no findings. The pre-existing "{{es}} will create" (future tense) on line 20 was not introduced by this diff and is out of scope.

Generated by Docs review agent for issue #6537 · ● 267.4K

Comment thread deploy-manage/deploy/self-managed/executable-jna-tmpdir.md Outdated
Comment thread deploy-manage/deploy/self-managed/executable-jna-tmpdir.md Outdated
Comment thread deploy-manage/deploy/self-managed/executable-jna-tmpdir.md Outdated
marciw and others added 3 commits May 20, 2026 18:14
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread deploy-manage/deploy/self-managed/executable-jna-tmpdir.md Outdated
@stefnestor stefnestor merged commit 1029858 into elastic:main May 20, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants