Skip to content

Conversation

@mrodm
Copy link
Contributor

@mrodm mrodm commented Feb 23, 2023

This PR updates the filtering in the release step since in the latest attempt to push a tag, that step was not executed.
It looks like build.branch is set to the same value as the tag. At least this is what the environment variables show:

BUILDKITE_BRANCH="v0.75.0"
BUILDKITE_TAG="v0.75.0"

The condition now is just the value of the build.tag.

@mrodm mrodm self-assigned this Feb 23, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Feb 23, 2023

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2023-02-23T13:55:57.525+0000

  • Duration: 2 min 9 sec

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

@mrodm mrodm marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2023 13:30
@mrodm mrodm requested a review from a team February 23, 2023 13:30
Comment on lines +46 to +49
stage('Check if the PR contains Buildkite pipeline') {
when {
changeRequest()
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This stage is intended to check if the PRs are "old", it means if they are based on a commit previous to the buildkite pipeline.

I think it could be just run in case of PRs (changeRequest()). The last run when a tag was pushed failed https://fleet-ci.elastic.co/blue/organizations/jenkins/Ingest-manager%2Felastic-package/detail/v0.75.0/1/pipeline/

@mrodm mrodm merged commit 54da22c into elastic:main Feb 24, 2023
@mrodm mrodm deleted the update_filter_for_release_stage branch February 24, 2023 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants