Skip to content

Conversation

@russcam
Copy link
Contributor

@russcam russcam commented Feb 5, 2018

This PR re-adds aggregation usage examples back into the documentation. Refactoring as part of 6.0 introduced aggregation related fluent, initializer and expectjson properties which are not picked up by the Usages Roslyn walker/visitor.

This commit re-adds aggregation usage examples back into the documentation. Refactoring as part of 6.0 introduced aggregation related fluent, initializer and expectjson properties which are not picked up by the Usages Roslyn walker/visitor.
==== Client Certificates

X-Pack also allows you to configure a {xpack_current}/pki-realm.html[PKI realm] to enable user authentication
through client certificates. The {ref_current}/certutil.html[+certutil+ tool] included with X-Pack allows you to
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this the correct way ? We broke the doc build on this before not sure if this ends up reverting it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That link looks fine there, but I'll double check. If I get a chance today, I'll take a look at AsciiDocNet

@russcam russcam merged commit f998ef7 into master Feb 6, 2018
russcam added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2018
* Re-add Aggregation usage examples

This commit re-adds aggregation usage examples back into the documentation. Refactoring as part of 6.0 introduced aggregation related fluent, initializer and expectjson properties which are not picked up by the Usages Roslyn walker/visitor.

* Regenerate documentation

(cherry picked from commit f998ef7)
@russcam russcam deleted the docs/aggregation-examples branch August 24, 2018 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants