Add script property to variable width histogram

[paulness]

A very minor feature enhancement. ElasticSearch supports an inline script property on the VariableWidthHistogram. This PR makes this supported by the high level NEST client.

This is already supported by the MultiTermsAggregation

elasticsearch-net/src/Nest/Aggregations/Bucket/MultiTerms/MultiTermsAggregation.cs

Line 54 in 96f36d0

public IScript Script { get; set; }

--
There is a useful use-case for this enhancement which is to bucket ranges on the log scale on the VariableWidthHistogram. This results in a more even distribution.

Example of use case

GET arc-37-5/_search
{
	"aggs": {
		"prices": {
			"variable_width_histogram": {
				"field": "lot.sold_prices_usd",
				"script": {
				  "source": "Math.log10(_value)"
				},
				"buckets": 300
			}
		}
	},
	"size": 0
}

{
  "took" : 0,
  "timed_out" : false,
  "_shards" : {
    "total" : 1,
    "successful" : 1,
    "skipped" : 0,
    "failed" : 0
  },
  "hits" : {
    "total" : {
      "value" : 10000,
      "relation" : "gte"
    },
    "max_score" : null,
    "hits" : [ ]
  },
  "aggregations" : {
    "prices" : {
      "buckets" : [
        {
          "min" : 0.0,
          "key" : 0.20126268733718639,
          "max" : 0.6989700043360189,
          "doc_count" : 585
        },
        {
          "min" : 0.7781512503836436,
          "key" : 2.036468418035862,
          "max" : 2.294415862797104,
          "doc_count" : 11561
        },
        {
          "min" : 2.294415862797104,
          "key" : 3.4601699053739163,
          "max" : 4.910529536362189,
          "doc_count" : 2103060
        },
        {
          "min" : 4.910529536362189,
          "key" : 5.365584337340739,
          "max" : 7.101131689337512,
          "doc_count" : 82957
        },
        {
          "min" : 7.101131689337512,
          "key" : 7.3633284959971546,
          "max" : 8.04433197055116,
          "doc_count" : 360
        }
      ]
    }
  }
}

The log values can then be converted back to the original values afterwards.

[elasticmachine]

Since this is a community submitted pull request, a Jenkins build has not been kicked off automatically. Can an Elastic organization member please verify the contents of this patch and then kick off a build manually?

[stevejgordon]

@elasticmachine test this please

[stevejgordon]

LGTM!

[stevejgordon]

Thanks for this contribution, @paulness. Apologies for the delay in getting to it. I have been focused on 8.x work.

[stevejgordon]

clients-ci failure is unrelated