Skip to content

Conversation

@lcawl
Copy link
Contributor

@lcawl lcawl commented Mar 14, 2025

This PR copies two response examples from https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/cluster-allocation-explain.html#cluster-allocation-explain-api-examples into the appropriate folder in the specification.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Following you can find the validation results for the APIs you have changed.

API Status Request Response
cluster.allocation_explain 🟢 4/4 4/4

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

@lcawl lcawl marked this pull request as ready for review March 14, 2025 09:47
@lcawl lcawl requested a review from a team March 14, 2025 09:47
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Following you can find the validation results for the APIs you have changed.

API Status Request Response
cluster.allocation_explain 🟢 4/4 4/4

You can validate these APIs yourself by using the make validate target.

@lcawl lcawl merged commit 8616217 into main Mar 17, 2025
8 checks passed
@lcawl lcawl deleted the cluster-explain branch March 17, 2025 23:51
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2025
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2025
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2025
lcawl added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
#3988)

(cherry picked from commit 8616217)

Co-authored-by: Lisa Cawley <lcawley@elastic.co>
szabosteve pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
#3989)

(cherry picked from commit 8616217)

Co-authored-by: Lisa Cawley <lcawley@elastic.co>
szabosteve pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
#3990)

(cherry picked from commit 8616217)

Co-authored-by: Lisa Cawley <lcawley@elastic.co>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants