Skip to content

[9.2] [ES-13486] Skipping ES builds on non supported jdk versions (#138262) #138625

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2025
Merged

[9.2] [ES-13486] Skipping ES builds on non supported jdk versions (#138262) #138625

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2025

Conversation

@neilbhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

@neilbhavsar neilbhavsar commented Nov 25, 2025 •
edited by atlassian bot
Loading

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 9.2:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@neilbhavsar
[ES-13486] Skipping ES builds on non supported jdk versions (elastic#…
df1557c 
…138262)

* Adjusting periodic builds to only run against supported builds

(cherry picked from commit 1844cb7)

# Conflicts:
#	.buildkite/pipelines/periodic.yml
@neilbhavsar neilbhavsar requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2025 20:36
@neilbhavsar neilbhavsar mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2025
Merged
@neilbhavsar neilbhavsar added the auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) label Nov 25, 2025
@neilbhavsar neilbhavsar merged commit 8975916 into elastic:9.2 Nov 25, 2025
35 checks passed
@neilbhavsar neilbhavsar deleted the backport/9.2/pr-138262 branch November 25, 2025 21:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport v9.2.2

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@neilbhavsar @elasticsearchmachine