[Recorded Future] Fix mapping for primary_entity#18325
[Recorded Future] Fix mapping for primary_entity#18325moxarth-rathod merged 3 commits intoelastic:mainfrom
Conversation
|
💚 CLA has been signed |
|
Pinging @elastic/security-service-integrations (Team:Security-Service Integrations) |
✅ Vale Linting ResultsNo issues found on modified lines! The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide. To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale. |
59461bf to
068fa28
Compare
🚀 Benchmarks reportTo see the full report comment with |
kcreddy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From the issue follow-up comments:
recordedfuture.triggered_alertitself is currently mapped as agroup(object), but one nested field appears mismatched:recordedfuture.triggered_alert.rule.use_case_deprecationis mapped askeywordwhile test/sample payloads provide an object ({"description": null}), which can trigger mapping conflicts.
Recommendation
Updaterecordedfuture.triggered_alert.rule.use_case_deprecationfromkeywordtogroupand define its child field(s), then regenerate package docs/assets and run package validation tests.
Can you fix this as well?
kcreddy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, after updating the commit message as well (include use_case_deprecation).
💚 Build Succeeded
History
|
|
Package ti_recordedfuture - 2.4.2 containing this change is available at https://epr.elastic.co/package/ti_recordedfuture/2.4.2/ |
Proposed commit message
Checklist
changelog.ymlfile.Related issues