Skip to content

Fix compile error#169

Merged
lzxddz merged 3 commits intoeloqdata:eloq-10.6.10from
lzxddz:fix-compile-error
Nov 21, 2025
Merged

Fix compile error#169
lzxddz merged 3 commits intoeloqdata:eloq-10.6.10from
lzxddz:fix-compile-error

Conversation

@lzxddz
Copy link
Collaborator

@lzxddz lzxddz commented Nov 21, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated an internal submodule to a newer commit to keep components current.
    • Extended the ELOQ data store build for the cloud S3 variant to include new S3 file handling support, improving cloud-backed data store behavior.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@lzxddz lzxddz self-assigned this Nov 21, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Updated the storage/eloq/store_handler submodule pointer and added store_handler/eloq_data_store_service/s3_file_downloader.cpp to storage/eloq/CMakeLists.txt when WITH_DATA_STORE is ELOQDSS_ROCKSDB_CLOUD_S3.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Submodule Update
storage/eloq/store_handler
Submodule commit reference changed from 9fc13524deb51390850482456d2a0b524a1e83ba to 4def573ca78dab2f59039f0c10e05d5f429e413e.
Build Configuration
storage/eloq/CMakeLists.txt
When WITH_DATA_STORE equals ELOQDSS_ROCKSDB_CLOUD_S3, added store_handler/eloq_data_store_service/s3_file_downloader.cpp to MYELOQ_SOURCES.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Spot-checks:
    • Confirm s3_file_downloader.cpp exists in the referenced submodule commit and compiles under the ELOQDSS_ROCKSDB_CLOUD_S3 configuration.
    • Verify the submodule pointer targets the intended upstream change and no unintended files were included.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix compile error #169 — updates storage/eloq submodule and adds s3_file_downloader.cpp to the same CMake configuration.
  • update subm #119 — updates the storage/eloq/store_handler submodule pointer (related commit changes).
  • update subm #117 — also updates the storage/eloq/store_handler submodule and touches S3-related build items.

Suggested reviewers

  • liunyl
  • xiexiaoy

Poem

🐇 I nibbled at a hash and hopped along the tree,
A pointer moved, a source added for S3,
My paws left prints on build and commit,
Tiny changes, tidy fit —
🥕 a carrot patch for CI to see!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Fix compile error' is vague and generic, providing no meaningful information about which compile error was fixed or what changes were made to resolve it. Provide a more descriptive title that specifies the nature of the compile error, such as 'Add s3_file_downloader.cpp to ELOQDSS_ROCKSDB_CLOUD_S3 build' or 'Update store_handler submodule to fix compilation issues'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f98a3fc and 5f13b71.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • storage/eloq/store_handler (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@lzxddz lzxddz requested a review from xiexiaoy November 21, 2025 06:32
@lzxddz lzxddz merged commit acc5ea5 into eloqdata:eloq-10.6.10 Nov 21, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@lzxddz lzxddz deleted the fix-compile-error branch November 21, 2025 07:13
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 21, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants