Skip to content

fix resend_message_list_ enqueue#276

Merged
MrGuin merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix_resend_list
Dec 8, 2025
Merged

fix resend_message_list_ enqueue#276
MrGuin merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix_resend_list

Conversation

@MrGuin
Copy link
Collaborator

@MrGuin MrGuin commented Dec 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved message re-enqueue behavior during reconnection so remaining messages are reliably processed even when entries are missing or non-contiguous.
  • Style
    • Minor logging formatting adjusted (no change to emitted message or behavior).

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Walkthrough

Replaced bulk re-enqueue with per-element move-and-enqueue loops in reconnection paths of cc_stream_sender.cpp, and added <utility> include; also a minor log-message formatting change in cc_shard.cpp. No public API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Message re-enqueue refactor
tx_service/src/remote/cc_stream_sender.cpp
Replaced try_enqueue_bulk bulk re-enqueue with a per-element loop that moves non-null messages and enqueues them individually in reconnection paths; added #include <utility> for std::move.
Log message formatting
tx_service/src/cc/cc_shard.cpp
Minor formatting change splitting a read-lock recovery skip log line across two source lines; no semantic or control-flow change.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Review per-element enqueue semantics vs previous bulk behavior (ordering, atomicity).
  • Check for potential race conditions or message loss during reconnect handling.
  • Validate correct use of std::move and ownership after moves.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • liunyl

Poem

🐰 I hop through queues with nimble paws,

Moving each message without a clause.
No bulky shove, just one-by-one,
Reconnects fixed, and the stream's well-run.
🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description is empty; no description was provided by the author despite the repository template requiring multiple sections including tests, documentation, issue references, and test suite confirmation. Add a complete pull request description following the repository template, including test confirmation, documentation updates, issue reference, and test suite results.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'fix resend_message_list_ enqueue' is concise and directly related to the main changes in the pull request—specifically fixing the enqueue behavior in cc_stream_sender.cpp.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix_resend_list

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a1f2f6 and 1b54445.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tx_service/src/cc/cc_shard.cpp (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tx_service/src/cc/cc_shard.cpp

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@MrGuin MrGuin merged commit ca669d8 into main Dec 8, 2025
4 checks passed
@MrGuin MrGuin deleted the fix_resend_list branch December 8, 2025 11:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants