Skip to content

Conversation

@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbc100 sbc100 commented Nov 17, 2025

These tests are not specific to --proxy-to-worker, but are merely testing that stuff runs in worker.

This lays the groundwork removing the --proxy-to-worker feature completely.

@sbc100 sbc100 requested review from dschuff and kripken November 17, 2025 23:48
@sbc100 sbc100 enabled auto-merge (squash) November 17, 2025 23:48
@sbc100 sbc100 force-pushed the workerfs_no_proxy branch 4 times, most recently from 1d6e3de to 17eb7a1 Compare November 18, 2025 01:04
@sbc100 sbc100 changed the title Avoid using --proxy-to-worker in workerfs tests. NFC Avoid using --proxy-to-worker for tests that need to run in a worker. NFC Nov 18, 2025
@sbc100 sbc100 requested a review from kripken November 18, 2025 01:04
@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sbc100 commented Nov 18, 2025

Ok, this should be good to review now. Sorry about that.

@dschuff
Copy link
Member

dschuff commented Nov 18, 2025

Since --proxy-to-worker isn't gone yet, do we still have tests that cover it?

@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sbc100 commented Nov 18, 2025

Since --proxy-to-worker isn't gone yet, do we still have tests that cover it?

Yes we have a lot of specific tests for it. And many test marked with @also_with_proxying

This lays the groundwork removing the `--proxy-to-worker` features
completely.
@sbc100 sbc100 merged commit 8857416 into emscripten-core:main Nov 18, 2025
34 checks passed
@sbc100 sbc100 deleted the workerfs_no_proxy branch November 18, 2025 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants