-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
Use passive segments instead of mem files #8974
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f58382c
Use passive segments instead of mem files
tlively 8ca94e9
Changelog and new error + comments
tlively ebafb5d
Merge branch 'incoming' into passive-segments
tlively 988e700
Update FireFox version to get bulk memory support
tlively 58c09d9
Merge branch 'incoming' into passive-segments
tlively 2ccc7c0
Unbreak fastcomp
tlively ddd1905
Merge branch 'passive-segments' of github.com:tlively/emscripten into…
tlively e835c8b
Merge branch 'incoming' into passive-segments
tlively File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -478,4 +478,3 @@ workflows: | |
| - test-upstream-browser-firefox: | ||
| requires: | ||
| - build-upstream | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is still confusing. I guess it will get simpler once fastcomp is gone, but why should
options.memory_init_filenot be the inverse ofshared.Settings.MEM_INIT_IN_WASM?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a great question and I don’t know the answer. @kripken did tell me it was complicated, though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried to simplify this but ran into fastcomp issues with how those are used (in bad ways). it seems more efficient to defer a cleanup til after fastcomp is removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM. This logic was confusing when I first added wasm backend support originally and I made it even worse then.