-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 258
docs: Add a REVIEWING guide #1169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Play this branch at https://endlessm.github.io/threadbare/branches/endlessm/docs-reviewing. (This launches the game from the start, not directly at the change(s) in this pull request.) |
| Unlike in some open-source projects, where the submitter is expected to make all | ||
| requested changes themself, the Threadbare maintainers may choose to fix issues | ||
| directly, on behalf of the submitter. We do this to reduce the number of times | ||
| that a pull request must be bounced between submitter and reviewer; and because | ||
| it is sometimes more efficient to make a change than to describe it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dsd you suggested documenting this particular point.
docs/REVIEWING.md
Outdated
| description not matching our style, the maintainer may rewrite the title and | ||
| description, then merge the pull request; if we notice a typo, the maintainer | ||
| may fix it themself, then merge the pull request. We will always explain in | ||
| the pull request why we have made such changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...with the aim of aiding the contributor in providing an even higher quality contribution next time.
(or something like that)
This serves the dual purpose of documenting the criteria by which we review a contribution, and encouraging community members to review others' contributions.
|
Apologies for not seeing this sooner. I think the added language is great.
Do we have any details on content review as well? Not just technical?
(Guns, for example).
…On Thu, Sep 11, 2025, 5:19 AM Manuel Quiñones ***@***.***> wrote:
Merged #1169 <#1169> into main.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1169 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZ5WJ2H4EJFP6ZFX5SSUVV33SDE3ZAVCNFSM6AAAAACGE7CVIWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJZGYZDINBZHA3TINA>
.
You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
I'm working on that next! |
This serves the dual purpose of documenting the criteria by which we
review a contribution, and encouraging community members to review
others' contributions.