Prepare repository for public open-source release#5
Conversation
Fix license mismatch (README said MIT + Commons Clause, LICENSE is MIT), replace Makefile with direct go commands, add CI workflow, issue templates, and PR template.
Summary of ChangesHello @fank, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on preparing the repository for public open-source release by standardizing development practices, clarifying licensing, and improving the contributor experience. It streamlines the build process, enhances contribution guidelines, and sets up automated quality checks to ensure a smooth and consistent development workflow. Highlights
Changelog
Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request prepares the repository for its public open-source release by adding issue templates, a pull request template, and updating documentation. The Makefile has been removed in favor of direct go commands in the README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md files to simplify the contribution process. The license information has also been corrected for consistency. My review focuses on ensuring the new development instructions are complete and consistent. I've suggested re-adding the version information to local builds via ldflags and ensuring consistency in the test commands.
Pin golangci-lint to v2.9.0 (v1.x built with Go 1.24 < project's 1.25), add ldflags for version injection in build commands, add -v to test command.
Summary
LICENSE(MIT) andREADME.md(was "MIT + Commons Clause")Makefile, replace with directgocommands inCONTRIBUTING.mdandREADME.mdmainRepo settings also updated
n8n,cli,go,workflow,automationTest plan