chore: address CodeRabbit review on #880#881
Conversation
- Correct CODEOWNERS handle casing to @Jordy-Baby. - Link benchmark citation to benchmarks.md for source provenance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 15 minutes and 28 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Restructure the MCP endpoint line to avoid URL-terminal period (parses as part of URL, causing 404 when agents follow the link). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
Follow-up to #880 addressing CodeRabbit review:
@Jordy-Baby(canonical).Test plan
curl https://docs.envio.dev/llms.txtpost-deploy shows the linked benchmark citation.Left out of scope: the Discord invite URL inconsistency CodeRabbit flagged (
discord.gg/enviovsdiscord.gg/Q9qt8gZ2fX). That's a repo-wide cleanup touching footer config and other places, better handled separately.🤖 Generated with Claude Code