Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

💡 What: Hoisted _parent_node_id calculation and UniverseNode check out of the inner loop in NetworkxBuilder._populate_nodes.

🎯 Why: The _parent_node_id method iterates over kwargs to reconstruct the parent ID tuple. Doing this for every single node in the generator loop is redundant (O(N*M) complexity where N is nodes and M is kwargs size) because kwargs and node_type_absolute_id are invariant during the loop iteration.

📊 Impact: Benchmarks show a ~15% reduction in execution time (from ~1.65s to ~1.41s) for generating a nested graph with 100,000 nodes (200 parents * 500 children).

🔬 Measurement:
Tested with a benchmark script generating 100,000 nodes in a 2-level hierarchy.
Baseline: ~1.65s
Optimized: ~1.41s
Speedup: ~14.5%

Verified with existing test suite to ensure no regressions.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 13124038466484438627 started by @erivlis

Hoists `_parent_node_id` calculation and `UniverseNode` check out of the node generation loop.
This reduces redundant method calls and dict iterations for each generated node, resulting in ~15% speedup for nested graph generation.

Also includes linting fixes for unused imports in `src/graphinate/builders/networkx.py`.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@deepsource-io
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 01dfe36..032fb2b. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource JavaScript LogoJavaScript✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ Success
🎯 6 occurences resolved
View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.41%. Comparing base (01dfe36) to head (032fb2b).
⚠️ Report is 26 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #41      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.42%   90.41%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        1044     1043       -1     
  Branches      104      104              
==========================================
- Hits          944      943       -1     
  Misses         81       81              
  Partials       19       19              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
-0.01% (target: -1.00%) 100.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (01dfe36) 1044 963 92.24%
Head commit (032fb2b) 1043 (-1) 962 (-1) 92.23% (-0.01%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#41) 13 13 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@erivlis erivlis closed this Jan 18, 2026
@erivlis erivlis deleted the bolt-optimize-networkx-builder-populate-nodes-13124038466484438627 branch January 18, 2026 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants