docs: replace thesis blockquote with plain Why section#11
Merged
protosphinx merged 1 commit intomainfrom May 1, 2026
Merged
Conversation
The "> **The thesis.**" deck callout plus the "The flakiness problem" numbered list duplicated each other and both leaned on the "VCR for MCP" framing. Folded into a single Why section that names the three flakiness modes in prose. Renamed "Why not just mock?" to "vs. mocks and snapshot tests" to drop the preemptive-defense framing. Tables, code examples, transcript format, programmatic API, FAQ, and roadmap unchanged.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
De-slop pass matching the rest of the README rewrite batch. Replaces the `> The thesis.` deck callout AND the duplicated `## ✦ The flakiness problem` numbered list with a single `## Why` section in flowing prose. Renames `## ✦ Why not just mock?` to `## ✦ vs. mocks and snapshot tests` to drop the preemptive-defense framing.
The substantive content (mode docs, transcript format, comparison table, worked example, programmatic API, FAQ, roadmap) is unchanged.
Why
The thesis blockquote and the "flakiness problem" section both said the same thing in different words and both used the "X is flaky because Y" framing. The rewrite says it once in plain prose.
How
Test plan
Out of scope