Skip to content

Conversation

@gomezzz
Copy link
Collaborator

@gomezzz gomezzz commented Aug 3, 2025

Description

Summary of changes

Better docs for parametrized integration

Resolved Issues

How Has This Been Tested?

Only doc change

Related Pull Requests

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 3, 2025

Overall Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
torchquad/integration
   base_integrator.py49786%28, 64–67, 71, 106, 110, 115
   boole.py30390%53, 72–75
   gaussian.py52394%77, 101, 119
   grid_integrator.py101397%41, 151, 255
   integration_grid.py49688%47–48, 55–56, 115, 118
   monte_carlo.py93397%80, 99, 225
   rng.py622461%70–73, 90–118, 138
   simpson.py29390%51, 70–73
   utils.py1181092%101, 136, 166, 170, 177, 189, 191, 197, 269, 276
   vegas.py161597%96, 100–101, 187, 334
   vegas_map.py98694%244–254
torchquad/plots
   plot_convergence.py131023%15–25
   plot_runtime.py8625%14–19
torchquad/utils
   deployment_test.py413515%18–62
   enable_cuda.py12650%16–21
   set_precision.py28389%34–37, 70
   set_up_backend.py19195%12
TOTAL106913487% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
53 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 54s ⏱️

@gomezzz gomezzz linked an issue Aug 3, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Base automatically changed from structural_improvements to develop August 3, 2025 17:54
@gomezzz gomezzz merged commit 9e93163 into develop Aug 3, 2025
3 checks passed
@gomezzz gomezzz deleted the docs-for-parametric-integration branch August 3, 2025 17:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Example/documentation for parametric domain of integration?

2 participants