I am testing esmini with larger road networks, and I encounter some problems (possibly memory leaks) as the application gets unresponsive without showing the window.
I was using the maps from the Carla simulator (https://github.com/carla-simulator/opendrive-test-files). Smaller maps (Town01-02) run as expected with a size of <1MB, but slightly larger ones (Town03-06) do not run even headless with a size of >2M. The medium-sized Town07 with a size of 1.6MB interestingly runs headless but not with a window. So the limit seems to be around 1MB in terms of map filesize.
I expect super-large maps would be out of scope, but I wonder what map sizes can be realistically achieved with the current architecture. Is this a bug or an architecture limitation?
Thanks!
I am testing
esminiwith larger road networks, and I encounter some problems (possibly memory leaks) as the application gets unresponsive without showing the window.I was using the maps from the Carla simulator (https://github.com/carla-simulator/opendrive-test-files). Smaller maps (
Town01-02) run as expected with a size of<1MB, but slightly larger ones (Town03-06) do not run even headless with a size of>2M. The medium-sizedTown07with a size of1.6MBinterestingly runs headless but not with a window. So the limit seems to be around1MBin terms of map filesize.I expect super-large maps would be out of scope, but I wonder what map sizes can be realistically achieved with the current architecture. Is this a bug or an architecture limitation?
Thanks!