-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 274
Pectra style edits #1285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pectra style edits #1285
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves updating the documentation for the Pectra upgrade process in the Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)Pattern
🪛 LanguageToolpages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx[uncategorized] ~41-~41: “you’re” (you are) seems less likely than “you”. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUARE_YOU) [uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”? (BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM) [style] ~42-~42: Consider using a more formal alternative. (MORE_INFO) [style] ~90-~90: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing. (REP_NEED_TO_VB) ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: “you’re” (you are) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...ctional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUARE_YOU)
[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ... after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...
(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
[style] ~42-~42: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tr...
(MORE_INFO)
[style] ~90-~90: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...a upgrade. The commits from the PR will need to be applied to your chain before Pectra ...
(REP_NEED_TO_VB)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)
64-64: LGTM: Clear and accurate technical explanationThe explanation of the fault proof system changes is well-written and technically accurate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ty!
Makes a few style and clarity edits