Skip to content

Conversation

@bradleycamacho
Copy link
Contributor

Makes a few style and clarity edits

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho requested a review from a team as a code owner January 25, 2025 01:26
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f460313
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67944a076e35ef0008ac749c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1285--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updating the documentation for the Pectra upgrade process in the pectra-changes.mdx file. The modifications aim to enhance clarity and precision regarding the upgrade steps for chain operators. Key changes include a refined description of the division of the Pectra upgrade, corrections to the phrasing of the OP Stack version release, and improved readability of the steps for implementing Pectra features applicable to L2s. Additionally, the section on fault proof enabled chains has been streamlined, and instructions for updating the Superchain Registry have been clarified with a direct link to the relevant process. Overall, these changes focus on improving the clarity and precision of the instructions without altering the underlying functionality or process described.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eeadf7 and f460313.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx

[uncategorized] ~41-~41: “you’re” (you are) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...ctional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUARE_YOU)


[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ... after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~42-~42: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tr...

(MORE_INFO)


[style] ~90-~90: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...a upgrade. The commits from the PR will need to be applied to your chain before Pectra ...

(REP_NEED_TO_VB)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

39-42: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix grammar and style issues

Several issues need to be addressed to align with the documentation style guide:

  1. Remove the extra colon
  2. Fix the redundant "you're are"
  3. Replace personal pronouns with proper nouns
  4. Add space before the link

Apply these changes:

-The OP Stack is dividing the Pectra upgrade into two parts:
+The OP Stack is dividing the Pectra upgrade into two parts:

-1. **Make the necessary upgrades to make sure OP Stack chains do not break when the L1 Pectra upgrade activates.** We will release new versions of the OP Stack to ensure that OP Stack chains remain functional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, you will need to follow additional steps outlined below.
+1. **Make the necessary upgrades to make sure OP Stack chains do not break when the L1 Pectra upgrade activates.** The OP Stack team will release new versions of the OP Stack to ensure that OP Stack chains remain functional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you are running a fault proof enabled chain, you will need to follow additional steps outlined below.

-2. **Upgrade OP Stack chains to support Pectra's new features that apply to L2s.**  We will implement all the features of Pectra that apply to L2s and will release a new version of the OP Stack that includes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tracking the spec work in this[issue]
+2. **Upgrade OP Stack chains to support Pectra's new features that apply to L2s.**  The OP Stack team will implement all the features of Pectra that apply to L2s and will release a new version of the OP Stack that includes these features. Additional information will be provided as engineering work completes. The spec work is being tracked in this [issue]

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~41-~41: “you’re” (you are) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...ctional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUARE_YOU)


[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ... after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~42-~42: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tr...

(MORE_INFO)


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e12903e and 91260b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx

[uncategorized] ~41-~41: “you’re” (you are) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...ctional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUARE_YOU)


[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ... after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~42-~42: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tr...

(MORE_INFO)


[style] ~90-~90: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...a upgrade. The commits from the PR will need to be applied to your chain before Pectra ...

(REP_NEED_TO_VB)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/builders/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

64-64: LGTM: Clear and accurate technical explanation

The explanation of the fault proof system changes is well-written and technically accurate.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ty!

@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit 3bf54bc into main Jan 25, 2025
8 checks passed
@sbvegan sbvegan deleted the bradleycamacho-patch-1 branch January 25, 2025 02:22
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants