feat(ci): update inputs for ci rebase/merge workflows

[spencer-tb]

🗒️ Description

• Support multiple EIPs in rebase workflow (comma-separated)
• Support combined EIP branches with + in merge and rebase workflows (e.g., eip-7708+7778)
• Add default: 'amsterdam' to fork input in rebase action
• Add input validation to rebase action (consistent with merge action)
• Fix static checks to run on each rebased branch individually

Combined branches are the result of merge conflicts handled manually.

Examples

# Rebase multiple EIPs
gh workflow run eip-rebase.yaml \
  -f fork=amsterdam \
  -f eip_numbers=7708,7778,7843

# Update devnet with combined EIP branch
gh workflow run update-devnet-branch.yaml \
  -f fork=amsterdam \
  -f devnet_name=bal/2 \
  -f eip_numbers=8024,7843,7708+7778

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast tox checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  uvx tox -e static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).

[Carsons-Eels]

Nice update to this, looks good

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.86%. Comparing base (1140c0e) to head (077c1ad).
⚠️ Report is 73 commits behind head on forks/amsterdam.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #2072      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            86.07%   85.86%   -0.22%     
===================================================
  Files                  599      599              
  Lines                39472    39390      -82     
  Branches              3780     3770      -10     
===================================================
- Hits                 33977    33822     -155     
- Misses                4862     4938      +76     
+ Partials               633      630       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.86% <ø> (-0.22%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[spencer-tb]

Will resolve conflicts next week!

[marioevz]

LGTM! It just needs a rebase and I've left a couple of comments. Thanks!

[fselmo]

bump 👀

[spencer-tb]

Whoops! Thanks forgot about this one ;)
Will update when I am next online

[spencer-tb]

Updated. Fixed the static checks too. They were only running on the last rebased EIP.

[Carsons-Eels]

Updated. Fixed the static checks too. They were only running on the last rebased EIP.

Did you need/want a re-review for the new changes?

[spencer-tb]

Merging! Might need to revisit these nonetheless following how we approach devnet branches moving forward re conflicts.