Skip to content

Update Changelog for 2.83.2 release#7948

Open
erosselli wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
changelog-for-2.83.2-release
Open

Update Changelog for 2.83.2 release#7948
erosselli wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
changelog-for-2.83.2-release

Conversation

@erosselli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ticket []

Description Of Changes

Update changelog for 2.83.2 release.

Code Changes

Steps to Confirm

Pre-Merge Checklist

  • Issue requirements met
  • All CI pipelines succeeded
  • CHANGELOG.md updated
    • Add a db-migration This indicates that a change includes a database migration label to the entry if your change includes a DB migration
    • Add a high-risk This issue suggests changes that have a high-probability of breaking existing code label to the entry if your change includes a high-risk change (i.e. potential for performance impact or unexpected regression) that should be flagged
    • Updates unreleased work already in Changelog, no new entry necessary
  • UX feedback:
    • All UX related changes have been reviewed by a designer
    • No UX review needed
  • Followup issues:
    • Followup issues created
    • No followup issues
  • Database migrations:
    • Ensure that your downrev is up to date with the latest revision on main
    • Ensure that your downgrade() migration is correct and works
      • If a downgrade migration is not possible for this change, please call this out in the PR description!
    • No migrations
  • Documentation:
    • Documentation complete, PR opened in fidesdocs
    • Documentation issue created in fidesdocs
    • If there are any new client scopes created as part of the pull request, remember to update public-facing documentation that references our scope registry
    • No documentation updates required

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel bot commented Apr 16, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
fides-plus-nightly Ignored Ignored Preview Apr 17, 2026 2:37pm
fides-privacy-center Ignored Ignored Apr 17, 2026 2:37pm

Request Review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@claude claude bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changelog update for 2.83.2 release

This PR is a clean, routine release changelog update: all individual changelog/*.yaml fragments have been correctly rolled up into CHANGELOG.md and deleted. The structure of the new 2.83.2 section looks good overall.

Minor findings:

  1. Typo (CHANGELOG.md:38): "verison" → "version" in the #7828 entry (carried over from the source YAML fragment, which had the same typo).

  2. Capitalization (CHANGELOG.md:74): The #7943 "datastore integration text..." entry starts lowercase, inconsistent with all other entries in the section.

  3. Section placement (CHANGELOG.md:75): The #7877 entry ("Replace static alphaRbac feature flag...") reads more like a Changed item than a Fixed item — replacing a static flag with a backend-driven config is architectural rather than a bug fix. Minor, and may be intentional.

No code changes in this PR.


🔬 Codegraph: unavailable


💡 Write /code-review in a comment to re-run this review.

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md Outdated
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md Outdated
Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
- Fixes steward filter states when assigned to a monitor [#7914](https://github.com/ethyca/fides/pull/7914)
- Fixed findings redirecting to correct confidence bucket [#7895](https://github.com/ethyca/fides/pull/7895)
- datastore integration text changes based on taxonomy of integration [#7943](https://github.com/ethyca/fides/pull/7943)
- Replace static alphaRbac feature flag with backend-driven RBAC config from Plus health endpoint [#7877](https://github.com/ethyca/fides/pull/7877)
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CHANGELOG.md:75

This Fixed entry ("Replace static alphaRbac feature flag...") reads more like a "Changed" entry — it describes replacing a feature flag mechanism with a backend-driven config, which is behavioral/architectural rather than a bug fix. Worth confirming this is in the right section.

Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <209825114+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant