Add CI builds to github actions#222
Merged
Merged
Conversation
etr
added
travis
Needed to run tests
Speeds up builds
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #222 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.62% 95.70% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 35 35
Lines 3246 3256 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 3104 3116 +12
+ Misses 142 140 -2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Travis keeps exhausting the budget which blocks the library from building (and executing tests). Attempting to use github actions for the same. Credits on github actions regenerate monthly and I estimate a consumption of <600 credits per month (of the 2k that are automatically assigned every month).
On travis they are assigned in bulk and while there should be allowance for OSS, support is being slow at assigning them which is slowing the development of the library. Having a github-actions based alternative, enhances independence in this sense.