-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Stability Property
Value is subjective and therefore price stability is an economic fiction. The exchange price of a money is is determined by its supply and demand which is in turn affected by the supply and demand schedules of all people for all products. Therefore the stability of a money is not a tendency toward constant prices in all other things. It is a feedback relationship between supply and demand for the money.
We can organize monies into three supply categories:
Commodity money supply increases due to the financial incentive to produce more when price is expected to be at or above production cost (inclusive of capital cost). This relationship between price and supply is predictable despite price (and therefore supply) not being so. Because price is not predictable this monetary inflation cannot be capitalized. Therefore all holders of the money suffer a reduction in value from the increased supply. Competition ensures that this production financed by existing holders is limited to the capital cost. Destruction of the commodity decreases supply and therefore increases value. The feedback of value decrease resulting from supply increase reduces production incentive, creating stability.
Fiat money supply is increased arbitrarily by the sovereign due to the financial reward of seigniorage and decreases due to destruction. When this monetary inflation is predictable it can be capitalized, which discounts the return on seigniorage. As such changes to supply are often not published. Due to state monopoly protection (i.e. production is the crime of couterfeit), competition cannot effectively limit returns to capital cost. The resulting sovereign profit (tax) is the reward of seigniorage and the reason for fiat. Monopoly protection is the sole economic distinction between commodity and fiat money. The positive reward of seigniorage is mitigated only by political unrest as people resist the tax, making fiat the proximate cause of the unrest.
Bitcoin supply is independent of price. Destruction of monetary units decreases supply and therefore increases value. Given that subsidy is predictable it is capitalized and has no affect on price over time. Its purpose is to rationally distribute units and so is eventually phased out. As fees necessarily rise with demand the utility threshold mitigates demand directly. Stability results from limiting utility as opposed to increasing supply. This is in turn an economic pressure that precludes linear scalability.
Users | Developers | License | Copyright © 2011-2024 libbitcoin developers
- Home
- manifesto
- libbitcoin.info
- Libbitcoin Institute
- Freenode (IRC)
- Mailing List
- Slack Channel
- Build Libbitcoin
- Comprehensive Overview
- Developer Documentation
- Tutorials (aaronjaramillo)
- Bitcoin Unraveled
-
Cryptoeconomics
- Foreword by Amir Taaki
- Value Proposition
- Axiom of Resistance
- Money Taxonomy
- Pure Bank
- Production and Consumption
- Labor and Leisure
- Custodial Risk Principle
- Dedicated Cost Principle
- Depreciation Principle
- Expression Principle
- Inflation Principle
- Other Means Principle
- Patent Resistance Principle
- Risk Sharing Principle
- Reservation Principle
- Scalability Principle
- Subjective Inflation Principle
- Consolidation Principle
- Fragmentation Principle
- Permissionless Principle
- Public Data Principle
- Social Network Principle
- State Banking Principle
- Substitution Principle
- Cryptodynamic Principles
- Censorship Resistance Property
- Consensus Property
- Stability Property
- Utility Threshold Property
- Zero Sum Property
- Threat Level Paradox
- Miner Business Model
- Qualitative Security Model
- Proximity Premium Flaw
- Variance Discount Flaw
- Centralization Risk
- Pooling Pressure Risk
- ASIC Monopoly Fallacy
- Auditability Fallacy
- Balance of Power Fallacy
- Blockchain Fallacy
- Byproduct Mining Fallacy
- Causation Fallacy
- Cockroach Fallacy
- Credit Expansion Fallacy
- Debt Loop Fallacy
- Decoupled Mining Fallacy
- Dumping Fallacy
- Empty Block Fallacy
- Energy Exhaustion Fallacy
- Energy Store Fallacy
- Energy Waste Fallacy
- Fee Recovery Fallacy
- Genetic Purity Fallacy
- Full Reserve Fallacy
- Halving Fallacy
- Hoarding Fallacy
- Hybrid Mining Fallacy
- Ideal Money Fallacy
- Impotent Mining Fallacy
- Inflation Fallacy
- Inflationary Quality Fallacy
- Jurisdictional Arbitrage Fallacy
- Lunar Fallacy
- Network Effect Fallacy
- Prisoner's Dilemma Fallacy
- Private Key Fallacy
- Proof of Cost Fallacy
- Proof of Memory Façade
- Proof of Stake Fallacy
- Proof of Work Fallacy
- Regression Fallacy
- Relay Fallacy
- Replay Protection Fallacy
- Reserve Currency Fallacy
- Risk Free Return Fallacy
- Scarcity Fallacy
- Selfish Mining Fallacy
- Side Fee Fallacy
- Split Credit Expansion Fallacy
- Stock to Flow Fallacy
- Thin Air Fallacy
- Time Preference Fallacy
- Unlendable Money Fallacy
- Fedcoin Objectives
- Hearn Error
- Collectible Tautology
- Price Estimation
- Savings Relation
- Speculative Consumption
- Spam Misnomer
- Efficiency Paradox
- Split Speculator Dilemma
- Bitcoin Labels
- Brand Arrogation
- Reserve Definition
- Maximalism Definition
- Shitcoin Definition
- Glossary
- Console Applications
- Development Libraries
- Maintainer Information
- Miscellaneous Articles