Skip to content

Fix links not rendering inside special blocks #1146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2023
Merged

Fix links not rendering inside special blocks #1146

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions exercises/practice/leap/.approaches/conditional-expression/content.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ _ = case p of
True -> t
False -> f
```

[wikipedia-syntactic-sugar]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_sugar
"Wikipedia: Syntactic sugar"
~~~~


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -113,6 +117,3 @@ In our solution above we have
[so-guards-if-cases]:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9345589/
"StackOverflow: Guards vs. if-then-else vs. cases in Haskell"
[wikipedia-syntactic-sugar]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_sugar
"Wikipedia: Syntactic sugar"
14 changes: 8 additions & 6 deletions exercises/practice/leap/.approaches/logical-expression/content.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ Here, `infixr 3 &&` indicates that `&&` has precedence 3 and [associates][wikipe
Similarly, `infixl 6 +` means that `+` has precedence 6 and associates to the left.
No precedence is shown for `not`, because none has been explicitly defined.
However, `not` is just a regular function, and function application always has precedence 10.

[wikipedia-associativity]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator_associativity
"Wikipedia: Operator associativity"
~~~~

~~~~exercism/note
Expand All @@ -55,6 +59,10 @@ Hint: fill out the [truth tables][wikipedia-truth-table] for both versions.
This is not possible in general: sometimes `(P && Q) || R` and `P && (Q || R)` disagree.

The motivation for the parentheses in the highlighted solution is efficiency; see below.

[wikipedia-truth-table]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table
"Wikipedia: Truth table"
~~~~


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -141,15 +149,9 @@ As you can see, this version always does at least 2 tests.
[operators-source-code]:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/ghc-prim-0.9.0/docs/src/GHC.Classes.html#line-509
"source code of the logical operators"
[wikipedia-associativity]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator_associativity
"Wikipedia: Operator associativity"
[wikipedia-non-strict-evaluation]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_strategy#Non-strict_evaluation
"Wikipedia: Non-strict evaluation"
[wikipedia-precedence]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
"Wikipedia: Order of operations"
[wikipedia-truth-table]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table
"Wikipedia: Truth table"