Skip to content

Conversation

@manumafe98
Copy link
Contributor

@manumafe98 manumafe98 commented Jan 31, 2024

pull request

Related issue: #2682

As the exercise does not have loops as a prerequisites, and we do not have a concept that introduces to while loops I made some slight changes to the reference resolution as well

Also I got my inspiration for the go analyzer

Reviewer Resources:

Track Policies

Also as loops are not a prerequisite of the concept I made some changes to the reference resolution
@manumafe98 manumafe98 added the x:size/small Small amount of work label Jan 31, 2024
@manumafe98 manumafe98 self-assigned this Jan 31, 2024
@sanderploegsma
Copy link
Contributor

I'm reading through the original .meta/design.md and it seems to be a copy of the one from elons-toy-car. It stood out because it mentions that constructors are out-of-scope, while the exercise teaches the concept of a constructor. 😂

So I would suggest updating the entire file in this PR to address this.

@manumafe98
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm reading through the original .meta/design.md and it seems to be a copy of the one from elons-toy-car. It stood out because it mentions that constructors are out-of-scope, while the exercise teaches the concept of a constructor. 😂

So I would suggest updating the entire file in this PR to address this.

Oh, good catch, okey I would update the entire file then

Copy link
Contributor

@sanderploegsma sanderploegsma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@manumafe98 manumafe98 merged commit 4dc6768 into exercism:main Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

x:size/small Small amount of work

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants