fix: explicitly document behavior when cursor entity no longer exists

[wschurman]

Why

Please describe the motivation for this PR, and link to relevant GitHub issues, forums posts, or feature requests.

How

How did you build this feature or fix this bug?

Test Plan

Please describe how you tested this change and how a reviewer could reproduce your test, especially if this PR does not include automated tests!

[wschurman]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• fix: explicitly document behavior when cursor entity no longer exists #453 👈 (View in Graphite)
• fix: eliminate some unnecessary any casts #448
• fix!: change adaptor -> adapter for consistency #452
• chore: docblock improvements #451
• fix: Make non-authorized construction internal and private #450
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a83c7cd) to head (b7ccc5e).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                                     Coverage Diff                                     @@
##           wschurman/02-15-fix_eliminate_some_unnecessary_any_casts      #453    +/-   ##
===========================================================================================
  Coverage                                                    100.00%   100.00%            
===========================================================================================
  Files                                                           109       109            
  Lines                                                         15970     15983    +13     
  Branches                                                        848      1433   +585     
===========================================================================================
+ Hits                                                          15970     15983    +13     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	23.44% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
unittest	95.43% <78.57%> (+0.31%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.