Skip to content

Conversation

@k255
Copy link
Contributor

@k255 k255 commented Jun 26, 2025

Description

Basic support for ImageContent response of MCP protocol.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Like in documented example with 'mcp web' interface

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

@f
Copy link
Owner

f commented Jul 6, 2025

Can you fix lint issues?

@k255 k255 force-pushed the feature/proxy-image-content branch from 1371d38 to 9a77c8e Compare July 6, 2025 20:59
@k255 k255 force-pushed the feature/proxy-image-content branch from 9a77c8e to 1ffa3a1 Compare July 6, 2025 21:07
@k255
Copy link
Contributor Author

k255 commented Jul 6, 2025

Can you fix lint issues?

done

@f f merged commit ca0de7e into f:master Jul 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@f
Copy link
Owner

f commented Jul 7, 2025

Thank you so much! 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants