{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.files",
"n_typable": 0,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 0,
"location": {
"line": 3655,
"column": 5
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.funcs",
"n_typable": 0,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 0,
"location": {
"line": 3656,
"column": 5
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.f",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3657,
"column": 5
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.f2",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3658,
"column": 5
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.f3",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3659,
"column": 5
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.showblocklist",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3660,
"column": 5
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.l",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3661,
"column": 9
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.detail",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3707,
"column": 31
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.postlist",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3720,
"column": 5
}
},
{
"kind": "attr",
"name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.pyf",
"n_typable": 1,
"n_typed": 0,
"n_any": 0,
"n_untyped": 1,
"location": {
"line": 3723,
"column": 9
}
},
Admittedly it's probably better if this would've been scoped in a helper function. But even so, I don't think that pyrefly coverage report should've included this.
For example, in NumPy, for
numpy/f2py/crackfortran.py, which starts as(src)
is reported by
pyrefly coverage reportas{ "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.files", "n_typable": 0, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 0, "location": { "line": 3655, "column": 5 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.funcs", "n_typable": 0, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 0, "location": { "line": 3656, "column": 5 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.f", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3657, "column": 5 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.f2", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3658, "column": 5 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.f3", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3659, "column": 5 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.showblocklist", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3660, "column": 5 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.l", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3661, "column": 9 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.detail", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3707, "column": 31 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.postlist", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3720, "column": 5 } }, { "kind": "attr", "name": "numpy.f2py.crackfortran.pyf", "n_typable": 1, "n_typed": 0, "n_any": 0, "n_untyped": 1, "location": { "line": 3723, "column": 9 } },Admittedly it's probably better if this would've been scoped in a helper function. But even so, I don't think that
pyrefly coverage reportshould've included this.Related to #3404.