Skip to content

Fix grammar typo in Design Principles docs#9324

Merged
aweary merged 1 commit intofacebook:masterfrom
abigsmall:patch-1
Apr 4, 2017
Merged

Fix grammar typo in Design Principles docs#9324
aweary merged 1 commit intofacebook:masterfrom
abigsmall:patch-1

Conversation

@abigsmall
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

features → feature

There is nothing "bad" about using state or lifecycle hooks in components. Like any powerful features, they should be used in moderation, but we have no intention to remove them.

I can’t explain the exact grammatical principle this violates, but it sounds wrong to my native English ears that “feature” is plural here. Another way to check if the grammar sounds right is to change the order of the clauses: ”They should be used in moderation, like any powerful feature“ sounds right, whereas “They should be used in moderation, like any powerful features” does not.

features → feature
> There is nothing "bad" about using state or lifecycle hooks in components. Like any powerful feature**s**, they should be used in moderation, but we have no intention to remove them.

I can’t explain the exact grammatical principle this violates, but it sounds wrong to my native English ears that “feature” is plural here. Another way to check if the grammar sounds right is to change the order of the clauses: ”They should be used in moderation, like any powerful feature“ sounds right, whereas “They should be used in moderation, like any powerful features” does not.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@aweary aweary left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems less awkward to me, thanks!

@aweary aweary merged commit 0c78630 into facebook:master Apr 4, 2017
acdlite pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2017
features → feature
> There is nothing "bad" about using state or lifecycle hooks in components. Like any powerful feature**s**, they should be used in moderation, but we have no intention to remove them.

I can’t explain the exact grammatical principle this violates, but it sounds wrong to my native English ears that “feature” is plural here. Another way to check if the grammar sounds right is to change the order of the clauses: ”They should be used in moderation, like any powerful feature“ sounds right, whereas “They should be used in moderation, like any powerful features” does not.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants