Follow up corrections for issue #382#387
Merged
encukou merged 5 commits intofedora-python:masterfrom Mar 9, 2018
irushchyshyn:follow-ups
Merged
Follow up corrections for issue #382#387encukou merged 5 commits intofedora-python:masterfrom irushchyshyn:follow-ups
encukou merged 5 commits intofedora-python:masterfrom
irushchyshyn:follow-ups
Conversation
After we started collecting build and run time requirers of python packages, we no longer need to run another query to get ambiguous requirers. We can just use the data we already have, and it speeds up the data collection.
Member
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Skip the step of querying ambiguous requires, as after we started collecting all build and run time requirers of python packages, we already have the data needed.
legacy-leafstatus for history data collection;legacy-leafstatus tohistory.csvand make sure the query refactoring did not break anything.#382