Help validate msw-inspector v0.3.2 with a real MSW project

[felmonon]

We just released msw-inspector v0.3.2 and are looking for five volunteers who use MSW in a real project.

This is a trust check, not a marketing benchmark. We want to learn where the scanner is correct, unsupported, or wrong before choosing the next feature.

How to participate:

1. Install v0.3.2 in a branch or local checkout: npm install -D msw-inspector-cli@0.3.2
2. Run without a failing CI gate first: npx msw-inspector --handlers "your-handler-globs" --sources "your-source-globs" --format json --report-file msw-inspector.json
3. Reply here with only safe context: MSW major version, framework or test runner, Node version, a redacted command or glob shape, the summary totals, and whether setup was clear.

Please do not post private code, private URLs, tokens, or unredacted reports. If you find an accuracy problem, a minimal safe reproduction is much more useful than a full application dump.

We are tracking the five-run cohort and the decision criteria in #41. Thank you for helping make coverage results trustworthy.

[felmonon]

@kingrubic @lovewave02 @Diyaaa-12 @tapheret2 — since you have contributed to or forked this project, you may be close to the kind of real-world feedback we need.

If you use MSW in a real project, would you be willing to try v0.3.2 once and share a short, privacy-safe summary? No pressure, and please skip this if you do not use MSW in a real project. The full protocol is in #41; private code, URLs, tokens, and unredacted reports are not needed.

A run that reveals an unsupported or inaccurate result is just as valuable as one that works perfectly. Thank you.

[Diyaaa-12]

Thanks for the tag! I don't currently have a project using MSW in production/tests, so I'll sit this cohort out but happy to help if that changes :)