Advection term support#965
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## fenicsx #965 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 96.09% 96.14% +0.04%
===========================================
Files 46 47 +1
Lines 2611 2721 +110
===========================================
+ Hits 2509 2616 +107
- Misses 102 105 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Co-authored-by: Rémi Delaporte-Mathurin <40028739+RemDelaporteMathurin@users.noreply.github.com>
RemDelaporteMathurin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking good! Just wondering if we could test more the multi-material case
| my_model.initialise() | ||
| my_model.run() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know we want to merge this but should we take the time to actually test something here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah we could have a proper MMS test for this one too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should at least write it down as an issue to remind us of it
|
Made a note that we should add another MMS test in a discontinuous case in #969 |
Proposed changes
Describe the big picture of your changes here to communicate to the maintainers why we should accept this pull request. If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to FESTIM?
Checklist
Further comments
Example usage in MMS test: