-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
feat: Ec2 2023 section9 sls #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Ec2 2023 section9 sls #10
Conversation
Co-authored-by: talledodiego <38036285+talledodiego@users.noreply.github.com>
|
I am sorry. I accidentally closed the PR when I deleted the branch in #7... |
DanielGMorenaFhecor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good work! Please, take a look at the comments and tell me if you have any suggestion!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please, define your public API under the all field. Please, take as an example this file:
https://github.com/DanielGMorenaFhecor/structuralcodes/blob/ec_2004_crack_control/structuralcodes/codes/ec2_2004/init.py
DanielGMorenaFhecor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work! I think that still some Docstrings are missing (my fault, as I did not realized the last time). Please, tell my if you want me to add them and I'll do it 👍
…enaFhecor/structuralcodes into EC2_2023_Section9_SLS
|
I have just updated some changes so there are no more conflicts with the most recent |
|
I have just reviewed the code so it is aligned with the typing practices we specified in our last message! With this, I think we may merge this PR as I do not think it needs further revisions. What do you think @mortenengen and @aperezcaldentey ? |
|
Great @DanielGMorenaFhecor! I will have a look and merge if no further changes are required. |
First partial version of Section 9 or FprEN 1992-1-1:2022