Skip to content

Conversation

@jeremyrsmith
Copy link
Collaborator

The currently used .retries(n) does not do anything for a
buildFactory application. Use a sensible retry policy instead.

This should be made configurable for 0.2.1 release.

The currently used `.retries(n)` does not do anything for a
`buildFactory` application. Use a sensible retry policy instead.

This should be made configurable for 0.2.1 release.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 74.438% when pulling 3220ed5 on retry-policy into e7cb64e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 74.695% when pulling caffc40 on retry-policy into e7cb64e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 74.672% when pulling caffc40 on retry-policy into e7cb64e on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 74.672% when pulling e408020 on retry-policy into e7cb64e on master.

@jeremyrsmith jeremyrsmith merged commit 867bdf8 into master Sep 26, 2016
@jeremyrsmith jeremyrsmith deleted the retry-policy branch November 19, 2016 00:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants